Study of Investment in the Organic Fertilizer Industry to Improve Community Economists
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31098/cset.v1i1.441Abstract
Based on the results of observations of organic waste in the village of Jogotirto Berbah, Sleman, it is known that the amount of household organic waste and cow dung from 2015 to 2020 continues to increase by ± 12% per year. In Jogotirto, the average person produces 0.36 kg of organic waste per day and 15 kg of dry cow dung per day. In 2020 the amount of household organic waste is 8,477 kg per day, while for cow dung is 16,787.75 kg per day. Analysis of the study of the establishment of the organic fertilizer industry is carried out by processing household organic waste and solid cow dung by fermentation. This fermentation process is carried out anaerobically for 21 days. The organic fertilizer processing process is carried out by mixing cow dung and household waste with varying ratios. From the results of research on making organic fertilizer, it is known that a mixture of cow dung and household waste with a mixture ratio of 2: 1 contains nitrogen compounds as much as 1.04%, organic C 17.6%, phosphorus 1.7% and potassium as much as 7.02%. Based on the analysis of investment feasibility using the Net Present Value method, the fertilizer industry can generate a profit of 200.18% for 5 years. Analysts using the ROR method can provide a profit of 31.7% per year and the analysis using the pay back method is known that the period of capital will return after 3.85 years. Based on the sensitivity test of the fertilizer industry, it is still said to be safe for changes in influencing parameters, namely the sensitivity rate of 20%. This study of the establishment of the organic fertilizer industry aims to provide advice to the government in the context of improving the community's economy.Downloads
Published
2022-11-15
How to Cite
Putro, G. M., & Prijoto, P. (2022). Study of Investment in the Organic Fertilizer Industry to Improve Community Economists. RSF Conference Series: Engineering and Technology, 1(1), 652–660. https://doi.org/10.31098/cset.v1i1.441