Creating Agricultural Product Innovations and Business Development: A Case in Farmer Women Group


  • Endah Wahyurini
  • Humam Santosa Utomo



agricultural product innovation, farmer women group, stakeholder


The Covid-19 pandemic implies a decrease in family income, resulting in social problems such as unemployment and poverty. This study aims to describe the process of creating product innovation carried out by groups of women farmers by using the land around the house to grow vegetables and the challenges they face. The study was conducted on a group of female farmers in Bantul, Yogyakarta using a qualitative analysis approach. Data collection techniques used observation, in-depth interviews, and focus group discussions. The results of this study indicate that the crisis conditions and knowledge play an important role in the creation of innovation in agriculture. The diverse knowledge of the members creates new product and service innovation ideas. Universities, local governments, and industry play a role in encouraging the creation of innovation and the formation of joint ventures so that members get economic benefits. The women farmer groups have grown their roles, not only as social organizations but also in business organizations.


Battor, M., & Battor, M. 2010. The impact of customer relationship management capability on innovation and performance. Journal of Marketing Management, 26(9-10), 842-857.

Sivadas, E., & Dwyer, F. R. 2000. An Examination of organizational factors influencing new product success in internal and alliance-based processes. Journal of Marketing, 64(1), 31-49.

Adler, P. S., & Shenbar, A. 1990. Adapting your technological base: The organizational challenge. Sloan Management Review, 25, 25-37.

OECD, Eurostat, 2005. Oslo manual: guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. OECD Publ., Paris, France

Pisante, Fabio Stagnari, Cynthia A. Grant. 2012. Agricultural innovations for sustainable crop production intensification Michele. Italian Journal of Agronomy 2012; volume 7:e40

Porter ME, Ketels C, Delgado M, 2007. The microeconomic foundations of prosperity: findings from the business. The global competitiveness report 2007-2008. World Economic Forum

Etzkowitz, H. and Leydesdorff, L. 1995 'The Triple Helix: university-industry-government relations. A laboratory for knowledge-based economic development', EASST Review. European Society for the Study of Science and Technology, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp.18–36.

Yuwawutto, S., T. Smitinont, N. Charoenanong, N. Yokakul, S. Chatratana, and G. Zawdie, 2010. “A Triple Helix Strategy for Promoting SME Development: The Case of a Dried Banana Community Enterprise in Thailand,” Ind. High. Educ., 2010.

OECD, 2011. Fostering productivity and competitiveness in agriculture, OECD Publ., Paris, France

Rangaa, L.M., Joost Miedemab, and René Jorna. 2008. Enhancing the innovative capacity of small firms through triple helix interactions: challenges and opportunities Technology Analysis & Strategic Management Vol. 20, No. 6, November 2008, 697–716