A Perspective: Interaction of the “Leading – Lagging” Continuum of Non-financial and Financial Variables in Creating Economic Value Added for The Company
Keywords:
Continuum Interactions, Nonfinancial and Financial Perspectives, Profitability, Economic Value AddedAbstract
Basically, there are two main goals that the company wants to achieve simultaneously, namely maximizing profits for the welfare of shareholders on the one hand and employee satisfaction on the other hand. However, the facts show that management has long placed non-financial factors in a disproportionate manner compared to the treatment of financial factors. The aim of this research is to present a perspective through analysis of the interaction of a continuum of non-financial and financial variables in creating an economic value added for the company. The population is the largest national construction companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) in 2015 - 2019. Using the purposive sampling method, more than 50 percent of the companies became the research sample. Data analysis based on panel data and processed using Eviews, as well as classic statistical tests (t test and F test). The results provide a perspective regarding the influence of training & development, and cost control on revenue, cost of goods sold, and profitability ultimately on EVA. In terms of the coefficient of determination, it suggests a solid impact from both training and development as well as cost control on the bottom line., R2 = 93 percent influence on Gross Profit, R2 = 82 percent on Net Profit, R2 = 91 percent on NOPAT, there is a significant influence of Gross Profit, Net Profit and NOPAT on EVA respectively with t test < 0.05 and F statistic > 1.96. From the interaction process of the continuum of research variables, with some luck, a combination of results obtained through measures and those based on performance indicators will emerge, starting from non-financial elements to financial elements. This finding is the result of an original approach in modeling the relationship between non-financial variables and financial variables. This research is limited to the construction companies and the research variables only select proxies for human capital elements that are linked to financial performance data.References
Brigham, E. F. & Ehrhardt, M. C. (2002). Financial Management. Theory and Practice. 10th Edition. South-Western: Thomson Learning.
Gitman, L. J. and Zutter, C. J. (2015). Principle of Managerial Finance. Fourteenth Edition. England: Pearson Education Limited.
Husen, A. (2011). Manajemen Proyek. Yogyakarta: Andi.
Kosomowidjoyo, S. R.M. (2017). Balance Scorecard. Model Pengukuran Kinerja Organisasi Dengan Empat Perspektif. Jakarta: Raih Asa Sukes.
McKinsey. (2006). Organizing for successful change management. An executive take on the top business trends. A McKinsey Quarterly Global Survey of Business Executives.
Meredith, J. R. and Mantel, Jr. S. J. (2006), Project Management. A Managerial Approach. Sixth Edition. Asia: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Peccei, R. (2004). Human Resource Management and the Search for the Happy Workplace. Rotterdam: Erasmus University Rotterdam.
Raharjo, D. S. & Limakrisna, N. (2023). LQ45 Company Profitability on the IDX for the 2021 Period Through the Effect of the Current Ratio and Receivable Turnover. International Journal of Professional Business Review 8(7):e02931.
Singh, J. & Yadav, P. (2013). Return on Capital Employed-A Tool for Analyzing Profitability of Companies. International Journal of Techno-Management Research, Vol. 01, Issue 01, June 2013 ISSN: 2321-3744.
