Designing Assessment Model of Quality Management Maturity in Manufacturing Industry with TQM Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31098/ic-smart.v1i1.28Keywords:
Quality Management Maturity Model, Total Quality ManagementAbstract
The design of performance assessment and measurement models is an important factor for any organization in an effort to achieve the expected goals in the future and as a tool to assess the success of the company. One of the most important performance measures is quality management. An assessment model that can be used to measure the performance of quality management is the Quality Management Maturity (QMM) Model. Until now, there has been no research related to the design of the QMM assessment model in the manufacturing industry sector. Until now, research related to the QMM Model only examines the construction industry sector, and the number is still relatively small. Even though, according to the 2020 Statistical Yearbook of Indonesia sources, the industrial sector that provides the largest contribution to Indonesia's national income in 2019 is the manufacturing industry sector. Therefore, the aim of this study is to design a QMM assessment/conceptual model in the manufacturing industry sector by identifying variables related to quality management. In this study, a literature study approach was used by examining ten journals that have a relationship with quality management. The results showed that the QMM model consisted of several levels, each of which was built by a number of quality management variables. Based on the results of the analysis of all available literature, the results of the variables at each level are obtained, namely at level 1 consisting of 2 variables, namely corporate-level quality and project level quality. Whereas at level 2, project quality level variables are divided into two variables, namely product quality and service quality. At level 3, corporate-level quality is divided into two variables, namely external management and internal management. In addition, at level 3, product quality is divided into two variables, namely physical quality and perceived quality. Meanwhile, at level 4, each variable result from level 3 is further divided into a number of variables. In external management, there are six variables, in internal management, there are 28 variables, seven variables in physical quality, four variables in perceived quality, and 19 variables in service quality.References
Ahmed, A. O. & Idris, A. A., 2020. Examining the relationship between soft total quality management (TQM) aspects and employees’ job satisfaction in “ISO 9001” Sudanese oil companies. The TQM Journal, pp. 1754-2731.
Baird, K., Hu, K. J. & Reeve, R., 2011. The Relationships between Organizational Culture, Total Quality Management Practices and Operational Performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, pp. 789-814.
Belay, A. M. et al., 2014. Adoption of Quality Management Practices An Investigation of its Relationship with Labor Productivity for Labor-Intensive Manufacturing Companies. Benchmarking: An International Journal, pp. 77-100.
BPS, 2020. Statistical Yearbook of Indonesia 2020. 1nd ed. Jakarta: BPS-Statistics Indonesia.
Gaspersz, V., 2011. Total Quality Management. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Umum.
Glodzinski, E., 2018. Project Assessment Framework: Multidimensional Efficiency Approach Applicable for Project-Driven Organizations. Warsaw, Elsevier Ltd, p. 731–738.
Habtoor, N., 2016. Influence of Human Factors on Organisational Performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, pp. 460-484.
Idrus, A. B. & Sodangi, M., 2010. Framework for Evaluating Quality Performance of Contractors in Nigeria. International Journal of Civil & Environmental Engineering, pp. 31-36.
Kemp, S., 2006. Quality Management Demistified. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Knowles, G., 2011. Quality Management. Woburn: bookboon.com.
Krajewski, L. J., Ritzman, L. P. & Malhotra, M. K., 2006. Operations Management: Processes and Value Chains, 8th edition. Indiana: Prentice Hall.
Mahsun, M., 2006. Pengukuran Kinerja Sektor Publik. Yogyakarta: Penerbit BPFE.
Modgil, S. & Sharma, S., 2016. Total Productive Maintenance, Total Quality Management and Operational Performance. Journal of Quality in Maintenance, pp. 353-377.
Okrah, E. B. & Fening, F. A., 2012. TQM Implementation: a Case of a Mining Company in Ghana. Benchmarking: An International Journal, pp. 743-759.
Pereira, D. D. S. & Oyadomari, J. C. T., 2014. Performance Measurement System and Quality Management in Small and Medium-Sized Brazilian Enterprises. Accounting in Emerging Economies, pp. 151-184.
Permatasari, F. L., Adi, T. J. W. & Wiguna, I. P. A., 2017. Assessment Model of Contractor Quality Management Maturity. Surabaya, The Third International Conference on Civil Engineering Research (ICCER), pp. 382-390.
PMI, 2013. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge. Pennsylvania: Project Management Institute.
Ronnback, A. & Eriksson, H., 2012. A Case Study on Quality Management and Digital Innovation. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, pp. 408-422.
Sardi, A., Sorano, E., Garengo, P. & Ferraris, A., 2020. The Role of HRM in the Innovation of Performance Measurement and Management Systems: a Multiple Case Study in SMEs. Employee Relations: The International Journal, pp. 101-118.
Singh, R. K., 2011. Analyzing the Interaction of Factors for Success of Total Quality Management in SMEs. Asian Journal on Quality, pp. 6-19.
Talib, F., Rahman, Z. & Q., 2013. An Empirical Investigation of Relationship between Total Quality Management Practices and Quality Performance in Indian Service Companies. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, pp. 280-318.
Tjiptono, F. & Chandra, G., 2016. Service, Quality & Satisfaction. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi.
Wanberg, J., Harper, C., Hallowell, M. R. & Rajendran, S., 2013. Relationship between Construction Safety and Quality Performance. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, pp. 401-411.
Willis, C. J., 2012. The Construction Industry Macro Maturity Model (CIM3): Theoretical Underpinnings. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, pp. 382-402.
Wilson, F., 2015. The Quality Maturity Model: Your Roadmap to a Culture of Quality. New York, New York University, p. Vol 36.
Xiaofen, T., 2013. Investigation on Quality Management Maturity of Shanghai Enterprises. The TQM Journal, pp. 417-430.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Notice
1. Author and Manuscript
- The author whose name appear in the above statement is declaring that he/she is the author of the stated manuscript
- All of the authors, if any, has already aware of this agreement and give consent for the mentioned name to act on their behalf
2. Validity
- The author stated that the manuscript is original and has never been published elsewhere.
- The author has obtained permissions from other contributors, if any
- The author has specifically mentioned and cited all external materials properly
- Note: External materials refers to any material, writings, figures, tables, illustrations, or any other materials which is not being produced, made, or patented by the author
- The author holds the sole responsible should there are any mistyping; unclear citation and holds responsible should there are any inappropriate manners such as unlawful, breaches, obscene, or any other reasons which are not aligned with the law and norm.
3. Deliverable of Manuscript and Other Materials
- The Contributor/Author shall deliver their manuscript using the provided and acceptable format (doc. Or docx) in the assigned date as well as author copyright document signed.
- Inability delivering the manuscript in the stated date and format will affecting the publication process thus, The Publisher have the rights to reject the manuscript and terminate the letter of acceptance or letter of offerings
- Author is responsible to deliver the manuscript using the provided format. Note: All of the figures, tables, illustrations, or any other materials that will be inserted in the manuscript need to be in high quality
- Should the author decided to alter the manuscript format, the fee will be charged and bore by authors
The Author give “Yayasan Sinergi Riset dan Edukasi” (here forth known as RSF Press) the unlimited right to publish the contribution identified above, without any restraints, in any form, at any time, directly or through others, to reproduce, transmit, archive, lease/lend, sell and distribute the contribution or parts thereof individually or together with other works in any language, revision and version (digital and hard), including reprints, translations, photographic reproductions, microform, audiograms, videograms, electronic form (offline, online), or any other reproductions of similar nature, including publication in the aforementioned book or any other book, as well as, the usage for advertising purposes. RSF Press will ensure that the Author’s name(s) is/are always clearly associated with the manuscript, and the publishers will not make any substantial change to the manuscript without consulting the author and ask for their consent. RSF Press is also entitled to carry out editorial changes in the contribution with the sole purpose of enhancing the overall organization and form of the contribution.
The Author retains the rights to publish the contribution in his/her own web site and thesis, in his/her employer’s web site and to publish a similar or revised version elsewhere, as long as it is clearly stated that the contribution was presented first RSF Press and the corresponding DOI is associated with the contribution.
