The Potential of CO2 Injection on Enhanced Oil Recovery Method for Oil Fields in Indonesia

Authors

  • Rini Setiati Petroleum Engineering Department, Faculty of Earth and Energy Technology, Trisakti University, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Gilbert Soenarjo Petroleum Engineering Department, Faculty of Earth and Energy Technology, Trisakti University, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Ixora Karundeng Petroleum Engineering Department, Faculty of Earth and Energy Technology, Trisakti University, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Vicky Dimas Widoseno Petroleum Engineering Department, Faculty of Earth and Energy Technology, Trisakti University, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31098/ic-smart.v1i1.24

Keywords:

CO2 flooding, enhanced oil recovery, environmental pollution, minimum miscibility pressure, recovery factor

Abstract

Indonesia is one of the countries that have large oil and gas reserves. So far, primary and secondary oil recovery can only produce around 20%-40% of reservoir reserves in Indonesia, so there is a large amount of oil potentially remaining in reservoirs. One of the Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) methods is CO2 injection because there are many sources of CO2 gas in oil fields in Indonesia. The purpose of this study was to determine the performance of the CO2 injection mechanism method, which can make hydrocarbon fluid miscibility and increase the recovery factor of oil wells. The methodology in this study is a literature review that discusses oil field data in Indonesia. Screening criteria use several parameters, including reservoir pressure and minimum miscibility pressure. Field data is then calculated and predicted using simulations. From the results of the simulation, calculations carried out there are six oil field areas that have the potential for CO2 injection in an effort to improve oil recovery, namely in the East Kalimantan, West Java, and South Sumatra areas, with recovery factors ranging from 50% - 90% of the original oil in place (OOIP). ). CO2 flooding has a good potential to be implemented in oil fields in Indonesia because there are many sources of CO2, easy to obtain, very good for increasing production rates in reservoirs with heavy and light oil content, and can reduce the results of environmental pollution from gas emissions.

References

Al-Aryani, F., Obeidi, A., Brahmakulam, J., & Ramamoorthy, R. (2011). Pulsed neutron monitoring of the first CO2 EOR pilot in the Middle East. SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference, MEOS, Proceedings, 2, 986–1000. https://doi.org/10.2118/141490-ms

Annual Report 2005, Kansas Geolocical Survey – Suburface, http://www.kgs.ku.edu/Publications/Ann Rep05/05techniques.html

Ayirala, S. C., & Yousef, A. A. (2015). A state-of-the-art review to develop injection-water-chemistry requirement guidelines for IOR/EOR projects. SPE Production and Operations, 30(1), 26–42. https://doi.org/10.2118/169048-PA

Carter L D (2011) Enhanced oil recovery & CCS. United States Carbon Sequestration Council, Palo Alto.

Dessouky, S. M. (2018). Numerical Prediction of Oil Formation Volume Factor at Bubble Point for Black Petroleum & Petrochemical Engineering Journal Numerical Prediction of Oil Formation Volume Factor at Bubble Point for Black and Volatile Oil Reservoirs Using Non- Linear Regression Models. (March).

Drahansky, M., Paridah, M. ., Moradbak, A., Mohamed, A. ., Owolabi, F. abdulwahab taiwo, Asniza, M., & Abdul Khalid, S. H. . (2016). We are IntechOpen , the world ’ s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists , for scientists TOP 1 %. Intech, i(tourism), 13. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/57353

Ego Syahrial, Hadi Purnomo, 2009, Oil Production Improvement with CO2 Injection on Old Sangatta Oil Field in East Borneo, LEMBARAN PUBLIKASI LEMIGAS, VOL. 43. NO. 2, AGUSTUS 2009: 166 – 175, http://203.189.89.59/ojs/index.php/LPMGB/article/view/142/128

H. Hawez & Z. Ahmed, 2014, Enhanced oil recovery by CO2 injection in carbonate reservoirs, Conference PaperinWIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment • December 2014, DOI: 10.2495/ESUS140481

Huang, T., Yang, H., Liao, G., & Zeng, F. (2015). Optimization of CO2 flooding strategy to enhance heavy oil recovery. Society of Petroleum Engineers - SPE Canada Heavy Oil Technical Conference 2015, CHOC 2015, 980–999. https://doi.org/10.2118/174480-ms

Khalil, M., & Biyanto, T. R. (2018). Optimization of CO2 Captured and Distributed for Enhanced Oil Recovery.

Kun Sang Lee, Jinhyung Cho, Ji Ho Lee, 2014, CO2 Storage Coupled with Enhanced Oil Recovery, Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41901-1

Merchant, D. (2010). SPE-139516 “Life beyond 80 - A Look at Conventional WAG Recovery beyond 80% HCPV Injection in CO2 Tertiary Floods.” Carbon Management Technology Conference 2015: Sustainable and Economical CCUS Options, CMTC 2015, 2, 1132–1141. https://doi.org/10.7122/440075-ms

Muslim, W. Bae, A.K Permadi, Suranto, Bambang Gunadi, D.D Saputra, R. Widyaningsih, T.A. Gunadi, 2013, Opportunities and Challenges of CO2 Flooding in Indonesia, OnePetro, SPE, https://www.onepetro.org/conference-paper/SPE-165847-MS

NETL. (2010). Carbon Dioxide Enhanced Oil Recovery. (March), 30.

Sugihardjo., et al. 2012. CO2 utilization for EOR at oil fields in Indonesia. http://www.ccop.or.th/eppm /projects/16/docs/INDONESIA_CO2-EOR-IOR.pdf

UKCS Oil and Gas Authority. (2017). Recovery Factor Benchmarking. Recovery Factor Benchmarking, (September).

Usman. 2011. The Potential of EOR Development to Improve Oil Recovery in Indonesia. Lembaran publikasi minyak dan gas bumi, 45 (2): 91-102.

Verma, M. K. (2015). Fundamentals of Carbon Dioxide-Enhanced Oil Recovery (CO2-EOR)—A Supporting Document of the Assessment Methodology for Hydrocarbon Recovery Using CO2-EOR Associated with Carbon Sequestration. U.S. Geological Survey, 19. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.3133/ofr20151071.

Downloads

Published

2020-10-12