Utilization of Reservoir Proxy Model for Development Strategy Optimization of Combined Steam Flooding & Cyclic Steam Stimulation for Enhanced Heavy Oil Recovery


  • Boni Swadesi
  • Suranto Suranto
  • Indah Widiyaningsih
  • Aditya Kurniawan
  • Ratna Widyaningsih
  • Agung Budiarto
  • Martrida Jani




combined cyclic steam stimulation-steam flooding, proxy model, heavy oil reservoir


Steam flooding (SF) and Cyclic Steam Stimulation (CSS) are thermal recovery methods that had been proven to improve oil recovery from heavy oil reservoir. Our previous work shows that the combination of CSS and SF give the better result than solely CSS or SF. However, the optimum operating parameter of this combination is yet to be determined. Our current work aims to determine the optimum development scenario of a combined CSS-SF applied to X-Field, a heavy oil field located in Sumatera, Indonesia. A polynomial proxy model is developed to evaluate the objective function, by running several simulations for the field subsurface model using CMG- STARS simulator and CMOS to assist multiple simulations. Optimum development scenario is obtained through maximization of objective function. This work shows that the combination of proxy model development and optimization results in best scenario of combined CSS-SF for heavy oil recovery in X-Field.

Author Biography

Boni Swadesi



Alvarez, J. and Han, S. (2013) ‘Current Overview of Cyclic Steam Injection Process’, Journal of Petroleum Science Research. doi: 10.1190/1.1444903.

Butler, R. M. (1991) Thermal Recovery of Oil and Bitumen. Prentice Hall.

Chapra, S. C. and Canale, R. P. (2015) Numerical Methods for Engineers 7th edition, Numerical

Methods for Engineers, Second Edition. McGraw-Hill. doi: 10.1201/9781420010244. Matthews, C. S. (1986) ‘STEAMFLOODING.’, in Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME,

(Paper) SPE.

Panjalizadeh, H., Alizadeh, N. and Mashhadi, H. (2014) ‘A workflow for risk analysis and

optimization of steam flooding scenario using static and dynamic proxy models’, Journal of

Petroleum Science and Engineering. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2014.06.010.

Srochviksit, S. and Maneeintr, K. (2016) ‘Simulation on Heavy Oil Production from Steam-

Flooding’, in MATEC Web of Conferences. doi: 10.1051/matecconf/20166807002.

Swadesi, B. et al. (2020) ‘Simulasi Reservoir Heavy Oil dengan Multistaging Development Modifikasi Inverted 5-Spot Kombinasi Cyclic Steam Stimulation (CSS) dan Steamflooding’, in Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknik Kimia “Kejuangan” 2020. Jurusan Teknik Kimia UPN ‘Veteran’ Yogyakarta. Available at:


Temizel, C. et al. (2016) ‘Optimization of Steamflooding heavy oil reservoirs under uncertainty’,

in Society of Petroleum Engineers - SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition

doi: 10.2118/182190-ms.

Zubarev, D. I. (2009) ‘Pros and cons of applying proxy-models as a substitute for full reservoir

simulations’, in Proceedings - SPE Annual T echnical Conference and Exhibition. doi: 10.2118/124815-ms.