Trade-Off Value Precision Analysis On Ideal Solution Value In Distance Based Multi Criteria Decision-Making Techniques

Authors

  • Sutrisno Sutrisno
  • Dyah Rachmawati L

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31098/ess.v1i1.174

Keywords:

distance-based multi-criteria decision-making techniques, precision, the trade of value, ideal value

Abstract

Most of the problems that exist in this world fall into the category of multi-criteria decision-making problems. Multi-criteria decision-making problems are characterized by conflicting objectives on a problem to be decided or resolved. Most of the problems in an industry are also included in the category of multi-criteria decision-making problems. Multi-criteria decision making is done by determining the trade-off value of conflicting objective functions using multi-criteria decision-making techniques. The trade-off value is the compromised solution value of conflicting objective-function objectives. A good trade-off value is a trade-off value that is close to the ideal solution value of each objective function. To determine the trade-off value in multi-criteria decision making, multi-criteria decision-making techniques can be used. Distance-based multi-criteria decision-making techniques include the minimum deviation method and the global criterion method. The precision of the trade-off value to the value of the ideal solution is needed by the industry when making decisions. A precise trade-off value, one that is very close to its ideal value, will help the industry make the best decisions. This research will analyze the multi-criteria decision-making techniques based on distance in producing the trade-off value. Through this research, we will find the most precise distance-based multi-criteria decision-making technique in generating trade-off values so that it can be a reference for the management of an industry in choosing the best multi-criteria decision-making technique when solving multi-criteria decision-making problems in the industry. Based on the analysis that has been done, it can be concluded that the minimum deviation method is more precise than the global criterion method in producing a trade-off value.

References

Balteiro, L.D., Pachon, J.G., Romero, C., (2017), Measuring Systems Sustainability with Multi-Criteria Methods: A Critical Review, European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, Vol 258, Issue 2

Belton, Stewart, (2005), Gamete and Immune Cell Recognition Revisited, Bio Essay, Volume 7, Issue 12

Cinelli, M., Coles, S. R., Kirman, K., (2014), Analysis of The Potentials of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Methods to Conduct Sustainability Assessment, Ecological Indicators, Elsevier, Volume 46, Pages 138-148

Gungor, (1999), Issues in Environmentally Conscious Manufacturing and Product Recovery: a survey, Computer & Industrial Engineering, Elsevier, Volume 36, issue 4, 811-853

Handayani, T., Wakhidah, N., (2012), Penerapan SPK Untuk Seleksi Mahasiswa Berprestasi Menggunakan Metode AHP, Jurnal Universitas Semarang, Volume 1 Nomor 2.

Huang, I.B., Keisler. J., Linkov, I., (2011), Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in Environmental Science: Ten Years of Applications and Trends, Science of The Total Environment, Elsevier, Volume 409, Issues 19, Pages 3578 - 3594

Indrianti, N., Sutrisno, (2014), Buku Ajar Pengambilan Keputusan Multi Kriteria, UPN “Veteran” Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta

Jiang, W.Y., Chun, Y.J., Jun, F.Z., Zhao, H., (2009), Review on Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Aid in Sustainable Energy Decision-making, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, Vol 13, Issue 9, Pages 2263 – 2278

Kleindorfer, (2005), Sustainable Operations Management, Production and Operations Management, Volume 14, Issue 4, 482-492

Muhsin, A. (2014), Logika Pemrograman dan Dasar Komputer, Jurusan Teknik Industri UPN “Veteran” Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta.

Pohekar, S. D., Ramachandran, M., (2004), Application of Multi-Criteria Decision Making to Sustainable Energy Planning—A Review, Renewable, and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages 365-381

Rahardjo, J., Stok, R., Yustina, R.,(2000), Penerapan Multi-Criteria Decision Making Dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Sistem Perawatan, Jurnal Teknik Industri, Volume 2, Nomor 1, Halaman 1-12

Ristono, A., (2011), Pemodelan Sistem, Graha Ilmu, Yogyakarta

Rohayani, H., (2013), Analisis Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dalam Memilih Program Studi Menggunakan Metode Logika Fuzzy, Sriwijaya Journal of Information Systems

Si, J., Halburd, L.M., Nasiri, F., Bell, S., (2016), Assessment of Building-integrated Green Technologies: A Review and Case Study on Applications of Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Method, Sustainable Cities, and Society, Elsevier, Vol 27, Pages 106 – 111

Downloads

Published

2020-10-27

Issue

Section

Articles