The Effect of Flow Rate Discharge on TDS, pH, TSS, and Cu in Electrocoagulation with Continuous Reactors

Authors

  • Rr Dina Asrifah Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Yogyakarta
  • Titi Tiara Anasstasia Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Yogyakarta
  • Mia Fitri Aurilia Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Yogyakarta
  • Vindy Fadia Utama Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Yogyakarta
  • Dian Wulandari Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Yogyakarta
  • Praditya Anggi Widhiananto Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Yogyakarta
  • Bagas Yusanto Wibowo Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31098/ess.v1i1.171

Keywords:

Electrocoagulation, Effect, Flow rate

Abstract

The gold amalgamated wastewater flow can seep into the soil and partly lead to ditches and end into seasonal rivers. The waste contains several heavy metals, including Hg and Cu. In the rainy season, runoff can occur which dissolves pollutants in wastewater at the ground surface so that water can flow into sewers or will seep into the ground and heavy metals contained in a waste can contaminate groundwater. Thus, it is possible to contaminate the quality of surface water (rivers) and groundwater (wells) around gold processing and wastewater disposal sites. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of flow rate as an independent variable in continuous electrocoagulation. This research was a laboratory scale and used gold processing wastewater from gold washing activities. Electrocoagulation in this study using a continuous reactor. Based on the results of the processing carried out by the continuous system electrocoagulation method. The discharge of Q1 (0.0156 m3/s) reduces the levels of TDS, pH, TSS, and Cu in wastewater greater than the discharge of Q2 (0.018144 m3/s). These results have also exceeded the TSS parameter quality standard which refers to the Decree of the Minister of the Environment No. 202 of 2004 about Quality Standards for Wastewater for Businesses and/or Mining of Gold and/or Copper Ore, so it is safe to dispose of into the environment. 

References

Abbas, S. H., & Ali, W. H. (2018). Electrocoagulation Technique Used To Treat Wastewater: A Review. American Journal of Engineering Research, 7(10), 74–88. Retrieved from www.ajer.org

Arafah, RR D., 2019. TSS, Cu, and Hg Removal With Electrocoagulation Method for Gold Mine Wastewater, 2th ICE MINE, Yogyakarta

Bazrafshan, E., Mohammadi, L., Ansari-Moghaddam, A., & Mahvi, A. H. (2015). Heavy metals removal from aqueous environments by electrocoagulation process - A systematic review. Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40201-015-0233-8

Butler, E., Hung, Y.-T., Yeh, R. Y.-L., & Suleiman Al Ahmad, M. (2011). Electrocoagulation in Wastewater Treatment. Water, 3(2), 495–525. https://doi.org/10.3390/w3020495

Cataldo Hernández, M., Barletta, L., Dogliotti, M. B., Russo, N., Fino, D., & Spinelli, P. (2012). Heavy metal removal by means of electrocoagulation using aluminum electrodes for drinking water purification. Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, 42(9), 809–817. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10800-012-0455-8

Chaturvedi, S. I. (2013). Mercury Removal Using Fe – Fe Electrodes by Electrocoagulation. International Journal of Modern Engineering Research, 3(1), 101–108.

Chen, G. (2004). Electrochemical technologies in wastewater treatment. Separation and Purification Technology, 38(1), 11–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2003.10.006

Danial, R., Abdullah, L. C., & Sobri, S. (2017). Potential of Copper Electrodes in Electrocoagulation Process for Glyphosate Herbicide Removal. MATEC Web of Conferences, 103. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201710306019

KepMenLH. Keputusan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup Tentang Baku Mutu Air Limbah Bagi Usaha dan atau Kegiatan Pertambangan Emas atau Batu Bara. , (2004).

Lottermoser, B. G. (2010). Mine Wastes (third edition): Characterization, treatment, and environmental impacts. In Mine Wastes (Third Edition): Characterization, Treatment, and Environmental Impacts. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12419-8

Malakootian, M., & Yousefi, N. (2009). The efficiency of the electrocoagulation process using aluminum electrodes in the removal of hardness from water. Iranian Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering, 6(2), 131–136.

Mamelkina, M. A., Tuunila, R., Sillänpää, M., & Häkkinen, A. (2017). Electrocoagulation treatment of real mining waters and solid-liquid separation of solids formed. 1070–1075.

Naje, A. S., Chelliapan, S., Zakaria, Z., Ajeel, M. A., & Alaba, P. A. (2017). A review of electrocoagulation technology for the treatment of textile wastewater. Reviews in Chemical Engineering, 33(3), 263–292. https://doi.org/10.1515/revce-2016-0019

Ni’am, M. F., & Othman, F. (2014). Experimental Design of Electrocoagulation and Magnetic Technology for Enhancing Suspended Solids Removal from Synthetic Wastewater. International Journal of Science and Engineering, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.12777/ijse.7.2.178-192

Nouri, J., Mahvi, A. H., & Bazrafshan, E. (2010). Application of electrocoagulation process in the removal of zinc and copper from aqueous solutions by aluminum electrodes. International Journal of Environmental Research, 4(2), 201–208. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijer.2010.10

Petsriprasit, C., Namboonmee, J., & Hunsom, M. (2010). Application of the electrocoagulation technique for treating heavy metals containing wastewater from the pickling process of a billet plant. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 27(3), 854–861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-010-0145-3

Rusdianasari, Jaksen, Taqwa, A., & Wijarnako, Y. (2019). Effectiveness of Electrocoagulation Method in Processing Integrated Wastewater Using Aluminum and Stainless Steel Electrodes. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1167(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1167/1/012040

Salih Muharam, S. M., Rahmah, C. I., & Yuningsih, L. M. (2017). Simultaneous Combination of Electrocoagulation and Chemical Coagulation Methods for Medical Wastewater Treatment. Makara Journal of Science, 21(3), 113–118. https://doi.org/10.7454/mss.v21i3.7302

Shafaei, A., Rezayee, M., Arami, M., & Nikazar, M. (2010). Removal of Mn2+ ions from synthetic wastewater by electrocoagulation process. Desalination, 260(1–3), 23–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2010.05.006

Touahria, S., Hazourli, S., Touahria, K., Eulmi, A., & Aitbara, A. (2016). Clarification of industrial mining wastewater using electrocoagulation. International Journal of Electrochemical Science, 11(7), 5710–5723. https://doi.org/10.20964/2016.07.51

Un, U. T., & Ocal, S. E. (2015). Removal of Heavy Metals (Cd, Cu, Ni) by Electrocoagulation. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, 6(6), 425–429. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijesd.2015.v6.630

Wulan, D. R., Cahyaningsih, S., & Djaenudin. (2017). Influence of voltage input to heavy metal removal from electroplating wastewater using electrocoagulation process. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 60(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/60/1/012026

Zongo, I., Merzouk, B., Palm, K., & Wethe, J. (2012). Study of an electrocoagulation (EC) unit for the treatment of industrial effluent of Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. Advances in Applied Science Research, 3(1), 572–582.

Downloads

Published

2020-10-27

Issue

Section

Articles