Effectiveness of Turbidity Removal by Direct Filtration

Authors

  • Ekha Yogafanny University of Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Yogyakarta
  • Titi Tiara Anasstasia University of Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Yogyakarta
  • Vindy Fadia Utama

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31098/ess.v1i1.150

Keywords:

direct filtration, removal, turbidity

Abstract

Umbulrejo Village, Ponjong District, Gunungkidul is one of the villages that has both karst and non-karst landforms. The variation of landforms that exist in this research area affects the quality of groundwater, either naturally or due to human activities. In the area obstructed by topography such as Umbulharjo Village, a centralized water management system is quite challenging, especially for those that use a piping system in its distribution. Hence, a decentralized water treatment system is required. The direct filtration method as one of the reliable methods in a decentralized water treatment system will be observed to treat water with a turbidity level of less than 10 NTU and 10 – 50 NTU. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of turbidity removal using the direct filtration method. This research was conducted by a laboratory experiment. The coagulation, flocculation, and filtration were conducted in a continuous mode for 3 hours. The dependent variables measured were turbidity and Hydraulic loading rates (HLR).  The effectiveness of turbidity removal in this experiment was all good. Better effectiveness was achieved by the filter columns operated in the lower HLR (2.88 – 3.1 m/h). The HLR was proven affecting the filter performance thus increase the workability of direct filtration. While the higher HLR (4.8 m/h) resulted in a fluctuation in effluent turbidity. However, these two HLRs as recommended in the direct filtration method were excellent resulting from the effectiveness of turbidity removal ranging from 71.7% to 100%. It can be concluded that direct filtration can be used in a decentralized water treatment system. 

References

Al-Kathily, F. (2014) ‘Direct Filtration using Surface Lakes Water in Iraq’, Global Journal of Researches in Engineering: E Civil and Structural Engineering, 14(2), pp. 39–60.

Eichelberger, L., Hickel, K. and Thomas, T. K. (2020) ‘A community approach to promote household water security: Combining centralized and decentralized access in remote Alaskan communities’, Water Security. Elsevier, 10(March), p. 100066. DOI: 10.1016/j.wasec.2020.100066.

EPA (1995) Water treatment manuals Filtration, Environmental Protection Agency. DOI: 10.1036/1097-8542.739400.

Fouad, M. et al. (2005) ‘a Simplified Empirical Model for the One-Stage’, (January), pp. 765–774.

George, A. D. and Chaudhuri, M. (1977) ‘Removal of Iron From Groundwater By Filtration Through Coal.’, Journal / American Water Works Association, 69(7), pp. 385–389. DOI: 10.1002/j.1551-8833.1977.tb06771.x.

Jeon, S. B. et al. (2016) ‘Self-powered electro-coagulation system driven by a wind energy harvesting triboelectric nanogenerator for decentralized water treatment’, Nano Energy. Elsevier, 28, pp. 288–295. DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.08.051.

Klingel, F. and Diener, S. (2014) Guidebook for the implementation of decentralized water supply systems in Moldova. Moldova: Skat Consulting Ltd.

Kohler, L. E., Silverstein, J. A. and Rajagopalan, B. (2016) ‘Predicting Life Cycle Failures of On-Site Wastewater Treatment Systems Using Generalized Additive Models’, Environmental Engineering Science, 33(2), pp. 112–124. DOI: 10.1089/ees.2015.0275.

Leigh, N. G., and Lee, H. (2019) 'Sustainable and resilient urban water systems: The role of decentralization and planning', Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(3). DOI: 10.3390/su11030918.

Lu, Z. et al. (2019) ‘Decentralized water collection systems for households and communities: Household preferences in Atlanta and Boston’, Water Research. Elsevier Ltd, 167, p. 115134. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.115134.

Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia (2017) Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 32 Tahun 2017 Tentang Standar Baku Mutu Kesehatan Lingkungan Dan Persyaratan Kesehatan Air Untuk Keperluan Higiene Sanitasi, Kolam Renang, Solus Per Aqua dan Pemandian Umum, Peraturan Menteri kesehatan Republik Indonesia.

Omarova, A. et al. (2019) ‘Water supply challenges in rural areas: A case study from central Kazakhstan’, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(5). DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16050688.

Pooi, C. K. and Ng, H. Y. (2018) ‘Review of low-cost point-of-use water treatment systems for developing communities’, npj Clean Water. Springer US, 1(1). DOI: 10.1038/s41545-018-0011-0.

Rabaey, K. et al. (2020) ‘The Third Route: Using Extreme Decentralization to Create Resilient Urban Water Systems’, Water Research. Elsevier Ltd, 185, p. 116276. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116276.

WHO (2007) ‘Physical removal processes: sedimentation and filtration’, pp. 21–50.

WHO (2019) National Systems to Support Drinking-Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene: Global Status Report 2019.

WHO/UNICEF (2019) Progress on Drinking Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene, Launch version July 12 Main report Progress on Drinking Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene. DOI: 10.1111 / tmi.12329.

Zaharia, C. (2017) ‘Decentralized wastewater treatment systems: Efficiency and its estimated impact against onsite natural water pollution status. A Romanian case study’, Process Safety and Environmental Protection. Institution of Chemical Engineers, 108(Azapagic 2003), pp. 74–88. DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2017.02.004.

Zraunig, A. et al. (2019) ‘Long term decentralized greywater treatment for water reuse purposes in a tourist facility by vertical ecosystem’, Ecological Engineering. Elsevier, 138(July), pp. 138–147. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2019.07.003.

Downloads

Published

2020-10-27

Issue

Section

Articles